Skip to main content

WBC 16 Update #2: Travel Ends, Conference Begins

So far as I can tell, Finland is composed entirely of the outlines of evergreen trees illuminated by the blush of their summer never-quite-night sky. At least, that is all I could see through the windows of the bus I took from Vantaa airport to Tampere, departing at 1:40am. Time, though, as measured by clocks, seems to have grown less relevant on this long travel day. Occasionally a fog laden meadow adds some relief. I'm sure the light of day will reveal a richly three dimensional country but, for now, my sleep deprived mind sees only elaborate parallel planes. 4:15am brings me to Tampere, a short walk to the hotel and I'm down for a quick nap. Back up at 6:30am, walk up to Tampere Hall, an interesting complex that bills itself as Scandinavia's largest concert and congress hall. That must mean there are larger concert halls and larger congress halls, but not in such a combination. I had a chance to make a lap of the facility and was drawn to the adjacent park by the call of roosters. They have a very nice set of chicken coops there for some reason. Most signs are in Finnish, Swedish and English, but not those for the chickens. Their purpose will remain a mystery for now.
Tampere Hall


Google Translate falls short

 After introductory remarks, Dongping Fang of Tsinghua University in Beijing gave an interesting keynote on the very ambitious efforts their newly founded IFCI has to forge a comprehensive systems-based view of urban resilience. He was followed by an fascinating take from Matti Kokkala of VTT on the how market dynamics of the technology industry could change the built environment. His specific examples were Airbnb for car parking and "drone" construction cranes, both of which seemed completely inevitable as soon has he articulated the ideas.

A short break on I was on stage in the Small Auditorium to deliver my presentation. As everyone was coming back from getting coffee, I thought it would be lightly attended. Having your conference at a concert hall had one interesting side effect. They used the intermission chimes to signal the beginning of sessions. It worked well as a healthy group showed up right as I started. I think things went well and I fielded a couple questions afterward. It's always hard to know how a talk like that goes if you don't have a confederate in the audience. I was glad to be done early in the week and happy to have some thoughtful questions. At the end of our session, a few of us proceeded to lunch. I had to excuse myself for what I hope you will agree is a well earned siesta.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Urban Play

Looking at this proposal for Atlanta , I can't help thinking there is something inherently elitist about urban recreation spaces that don't include playgrounds or sports courts and fields. The abstract, curvilinear forms that are fashionable today are almost completely irreconcilable with activities like basketball or soccer or softball. Those activities are pushed to second-class parks that receive virtually no programming effort and minimal maintenance. Add to that the sometimes stark racial and cultural divides between participants in these various sports and I can see why it is convenient for city staff to think that a "nice" park doesn't have sports facilities, perhaps only subconsciously. Designs with swooping paths and undulating terrain help conceal that prejudice. It isn't an entirely fair criticism of this particular project as they appear to be trying to add something public, green and walkable to what might otherwise be entirely vehicle oriented.  ...
1 comment
Read more

Bloomberg Surveillance

I was watching a little Bloomberg this morning. An interesting moment occurred when Tom Keene was discussing the talks  going on in Paris. I wish I had the exact phrasing, but he said something like, “We really need to wait until we see the impacts [of climate change] before we can try to prevent them.” His tone sort of trailed off at the end as if the contradiction of that statement occurred to him mid-sentence. His point was, I believe, that it would be irresponsible to spend big money trying to prevent something that might not happen. They then moved on to the massive smog alert  going on in Beijing and how the health impacts of burning coal have brought the Chinese government to the table sooner than anyone had imagined possible. Unfortunately, he and his fellow commentators failed to put these two ideas together:   If we wait until we see the impacts, it will be too late to avoid them. When inaction risks many lives, the only prudent thing to do is act now.* ...
1 comment
Read more

The Value of Pop Economics?

A friend recently posted a meme about rising income inequality to Facebook. One of the comments was a link to a piece from Economics Explained with the provocative title " How The Dutch Economy Shows We Can't Reduce Wealth Inequality With Taxes " I'm starting to see a pattern in these sorts of economics articles: 1. Make a pointed and contrarian claim about the power of economics to address a major issue in contemporary society (taxes won't fix inequality). 2. Compare related economics concepts that have much narrower definitions than the ones that drew in the reader (GINI vs income & wealth inequality vs a few specific aspects of Dutch taxes and culture). 3. Add some artfully selected facts to keep people interested (Heineken family info). 4. Also artfully avoid saying explicitly that the narrow comparison proves or disproves anything specific about the broader societal problem. 5. Make a generally agreeable statement about the world: Inequality doesn't ...
Post a Comment
Read more