Skip to main content

WBC 16 Update #4: Get the Digits

Today finished on a strong note about building performance and metrics. It started with a keynote from Skanska - Finland's CEO, Tuomas Sarkilahti. The key notes (sorry) I took away were that their strategic planning process starts with defining their organizational values, that ethics is a muscle that must be exercised, and that process compliance results in stronger margins. Later in the day, I'd hear a dissenting opinion on that last point. The second keynote speaker was Peter Barrett from the University of Salford. He presented a wide-ranging research effort in UK primary schools to create practical strategies that are informed by student outcomes. Their report is available here: Clever Classrooms. I was pleased to hear him say our industry would respond best to client-driven change as that aligns with the paper I presented.

 The morning session I attended was the AEC CEO Forum. The first speaker was Shyam Sunder, the lead World Trade Center investigator from NIST. I'd like to provide a link to his bio, but he's been the target of many of the 9/11 conspiracy theories and I can't quite sort through that noise at the moment. At any rate, I found the presentation to be convincing. It certainly demonstrates the level of building performance modeling that can be achieved in a forensic setting, as unfortunate as that may be. He was followed by A. Jack Davis from Virginia Tech, who covered their research collaboration efforts with industry. It was impressive stuff, but I'm still a little unclear as to how to get that going locally.
Vanilja on a beautiful Finnish afternoon
The session immediately after lunch was more on building performance with the Smart and Sustainable Office project figuring prominently. The most interesting session by far followed afternoon coffee. Dean Kashiwagi and Sicco Santema presented their extensive research on implementing the Best Value Approach throughout different procurement supply chains. Dean's enthusiasm approaches evangelical zeal but I do believe they are on to something. Probably the most challenging aspect of employing their approach in architecture would be to decide what form of metrics are convincing expressions of our efficacy.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Urban Play

Looking at this proposal for Atlanta , I can't help thinking there is something inherently elitist about urban recreation spaces that don't include playgrounds or sports courts and fields. The abstract, curvilinear forms that are fashionable today are almost completely irreconcilable with activities like basketball or soccer or softball. Those activities are pushed to second-class parks that receive virtually no programming effort and minimal maintenance. Add to that the sometimes stark racial and cultural divides between participants in these various sports and I can see why it is convenient for city staff to think that a "nice" park doesn't have sports facilities, perhaps only subconsciously. Designs with swooping paths and undulating terrain help conceal that prejudice. It isn't an entirely fair criticism of this particular project as they appear to be trying to add something public, green and walkable to what might otherwise be entirely vehicle oriented.  ...
1 comment
Read more

Bloomberg Surveillance

I was watching a little Bloomberg this morning. An interesting moment occurred when Tom Keene was discussing the talks  going on in Paris. I wish I had the exact phrasing, but he said something like, “We really need to wait until we see the impacts [of climate change] before we can try to prevent them.” His tone sort of trailed off at the end as if the contradiction of that statement occurred to him mid-sentence. His point was, I believe, that it would be irresponsible to spend big money trying to prevent something that might not happen. They then moved on to the massive smog alert  going on in Beijing and how the health impacts of burning coal have brought the Chinese government to the table sooner than anyone had imagined possible. Unfortunately, he and his fellow commentators failed to put these two ideas together:   If we wait until we see the impacts, it will be too late to avoid them. When inaction risks many lives, the only prudent thing to do is act now.* ...
1 comment
Read more

The Value of Pop Economics?

A friend recently posted a meme about rising income inequality to Facebook. One of the comments was a link to a piece from Economics Explained with the provocative title " How The Dutch Economy Shows We Can't Reduce Wealth Inequality With Taxes " I'm starting to see a pattern in these sorts of economics articles: 1. Make a pointed and contrarian claim about the power of economics to address a major issue in contemporary society (taxes won't fix inequality). 2. Compare related economics concepts that have much narrower definitions than the ones that drew in the reader (GINI vs income & wealth inequality vs a few specific aspects of Dutch taxes and culture). 3. Add some artfully selected facts to keep people interested (Heineken family info). 4. Also artfully avoid saying explicitly that the narrow comparison proves or disproves anything specific about the broader societal problem. 5. Make a generally agreeable statement about the world: Inequality doesn't ...
Post a Comment
Read more